Dickens & Rumi
Cover of Isle of Dogs

film

Isle of Dogs

2018

In the future, an outbreak of canine flu leads the mayor of a Japanese city to banish all dogs to an island used as a garbage dump. The outcasts must soon embark on an epic journey when a 12-year-old boy arrives on the island to find his beloved pet.

Source checked

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended ageNot listed

Strongest cautions

  • Death of a character4/5
  • Frightening scenes4/5
  • Violence4/5

Strongest positives

  • Courage & resilience5/5
  • Creativity & curiosity5/5
  • Good role models4/5

What’s in it?

Products & advertising1/5
Why this rating?

The film includes fictional brand imagery, though no real-world products are aggressively marketed.

Death of a character4/5
Why this rating?

Multiple dogs and human characters face death or are killed; includes a political assassination and the threat of mass euthanasia.

Graphic injury2/5
Why this rating?

Brief glimpses of blood, including surgery and a minor decapitation (historical context), though handled in a stylized, puppet-animation manner.

Strong language2/5
Why this rating?

The film includes occasional mild profanity or rude language, but no indication of frequent strong language or slurs.

Religious themes1/5
Why this rating?

Features light cultural references to Shinto traditions and priests in a respectful, atmospheric manner.

Romance2/5
Why this rating?

Contains innocent, puppy-love style romance between the child protagonist and an exchange student, as well as a pairing between two dogs.

Frightening scenes4/5
Why this rating?

A child faces danger, dogs are hunted and threatened with poison-gas extermination, and a cage appears to hold a skeleton. Stop-motion style softens but does not erase the intense peril.

Sexual content & nudity1/5
Why this rating?

No sexual content present.

Alcohol or drugs1/5
Why this rating?

Contains brief references to poison/serum administration, but no recreational drug use.

Violence4/5
Why this rating?

Includes stylized battles between dogs, airplane crashes, and characters being injured or killed by poisoned food or weapons.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience5/5
Why this rating?

The dogs and Atari show significant, principled bravery in the face of systemic adversity.

Creativity & curiosity5/5
Why this rating?

A highly inventive and visually unique stop-motion project that encourages imaginative thinking.

Diverse representation3/5
Why this rating?

The story is set in Japan with Japanese characters; while some critique was leveled at the cultural representation, it portrays diverse individual characters.

Educational value1/5
Why this rating?

Offers exposure to Japanese culture and language (via subtitles), though it is not primarily an educational work.

Kindness & empathy4/5
Why this rating?

Kindness, empathy, and collective care are the primary drivers of the story's positive outcome.

Positive messages4/5
Why this rating?

Promotes themes of integrity, standing up to injustice, and the profound value of the bond between pets and owners.

Good role models4/5
Why this rating?

The protagonist shows great courage and initiative, serving as a positive role model for sticking to one's moral convictions.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. What did courage look like in this story? Was being brave always the same as being fearless?
  2. How did the story approach death or loss? What helped the characters cope?
  3. Which choice in Isle of Dogs would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in Isle of Dogs, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to watch or buy

As an Amazon Associate, Dickens & Rumi may earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating