Dickens & Rumi
Cover of 2012

film

2012

2009

Dr. Adrian Helmsley, part of a worldwide geophysical team investigating the effect on the earth of radiation from unprecedented solar storms, learns that the earth's core is heating up. He warns U.S. President Thomas Wilson that the crust of the earth is becoming unstable and that without proper preparations for saving a fraction of the world's population, the entire race is doomed. Meanwhile, writer Jackson Curtis stumbles on the same information. While the world's leaders race to build "arks" to escape the impending cataclysm, Curtis struggles to find a way to save his family. Meanwhile, volcanic eruptions and earthquakes of unprecedented strength wreak havoc around the world.

Ages 13+Source checked

Why this age? Frequent large-scale destruction, terrifying disasters, deaths of major and supporting characters, peril to children, drowning, crushing, and emotionally intense survival scenes make it best suited to teens. This is guidance, not a safety guarantee; reading level and family context may differ.

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended age13+

Strongest cautions

  • Death of a character5/5
  • Frightening scenes5/5
  • Violence4/5

Strongest positives

  • Courage & resilience4/5
  • Creativity & curiosity3/5
  • Diverse representation3/5

What’s in it?

Products & advertising2/5
Why this rating?

The story features wealthy ticket-buyers, a billionaire, and recognizable luxury vehicles; commercial marketing was also substantial, though products are not the main focus.

Death of a character5/5
Why this rating?

Mass death is central, including billions worldwide and deaths of named characters such as Charlie, Sasha, Gordon, Tamara, Yuri, and President Wilson.

Graphic injury2/5
Why this rating?

Deaths and crushing or debris-related injuries occur during disasters, but the film emphasizes spectacle and survival rather than graphic blood or wound detail.

Strong language2/5
Why this rating?

Some profanity and heated language appear, but strong language is occasional rather than pervasive or central.

Religious themes2/5
Why this rating?

A Buddhist monk and his family appear, and Buddhist settings are part of the survival narrative, but religion is not the central theme.

Romance2/5
Why this rating?

Family reconciliation and emerging relationships occur alongside the survival plot; romance is present but clearly secondary.

Frightening scenes5/5
Why this rating?

Sustained end-of-the-world peril includes earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, megatsunamis, collapsing cities, plane danger, flooding, and children at risk.

Sexual content & nudity1/5
Why this rating?

Mild sexual references and innuendo.

Alcohol or drugs1/5
Why this rating?

Substance use is not a meaningful story element; any use appears limited to incidental adult or background behavior.

Violence4/5
Why this rating?

Repeated catastrophic destruction, dangerous escapes, crashes, falls, and people being killed or endangered during earthquakes, eruptions, floods, and collapsing structures.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience4/5
Why this rating?

Courage is central as characters repeatedly face overwhelming disasters, rescue others, return to danger, and make sacrifices to protect people.

Creativity & curiosity3/5
Why this rating?

The film encourages imaginative thinking about planetary catastrophe, engineering survival arks, scientific theories, and inventive problem-solving under pressure.

Diverse representation3/5
Why this rating?

The international cast and story include people from several countries, cultures, and social classes with meaningful roles, though representation is not the primary focus.

Educational value1/5
Why this rating?

It introduces geology, disaster science, global coordination, cultural preservation, and ethical allocation of survival resources, though primarily as entertainment.

Kindness & empathy3/5
Why this rating?

Characters rescue family members, help strangers board the arks, share information, and cooperate across national and social boundaries.

Positive messages3/5
Why this rating?

The film emphasizes family loyalty, cooperation, compassion, leadership, and fairness over saving only the wealthy, while showing selfishness and sacrifice as consequential.

Good role models3/5
Why this rating?

Characters show persistence, protective family commitment, scientific responsibility, courage, and advocacy for excluded survivors, despite some selfish or unethical behavior.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. What did courage look like in this story? Was being brave always the same as being fearless?
  2. How did the story approach death or loss? What helped the characters cope?
  3. Which choice in 2012 would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in 2012, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to watch or buy

Buy or rent on AmazonFind on JustWatch

As an Amazon Associate, Dickens & Rumi may earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating