Dickens & Rumi

book

The brass verdict

Michael Connelly · 2008

Explore the age guidance, content cautions, positive qualities, and supporting notes for The brass verdict by Michael Connelly. This book is content notes include Death of a character, Violence, Alcohol or drugs; positive qualities include Courage & resilience, Positive messages.

Source checked

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended ageNot listed

Strongest cautions

  • Death of a character4/5
  • Violence4/5
  • Alcohol or drugs3/5

Strongest positives

  • Courage & resilience3/5
  • Positive messages3/5
  • Creativity & curiosity2/5

What’s in it?

Products & advertising1/5
Why this rating?

Mentions of real-world brands (e.g., Lincoln) as part of the character setting; not commercial marketing.

Death of a character4/5
Why this rating?

Multiple characters die, including a lawyer, a client, and other secondary characters. Death is central to the plot.

Graphic injury2/5
Why this rating?

Standard crime thriller violence; impacts of shootings and physical assaults are described without excessive, gratuitous detail.

Strong language3/5
Why this rating?

A gritty crime and courtroom thriller likely includes recurring mild-to-moderate profanity, though the supplied excerpt gives no direct examples.

Romance1/5
Why this rating?

Adult relationships and an ex-spouse working together appear in the professional story, but romance is not central.

Frightening scenes3/5
Why this rating?

Threats, surveillance, murder investigations, corruption, and a planned attack create sustained adult suspense and danger.

Sexual content & nudity1/5
Why this rating?

Brief mentions of affairs and personal lives; no explicit content.

Alcohol or drugs3/5
Why this rating?

The protagonist's struggle with painkiller addiction is a significant plot point and character motivation.

Violence4/5
Why this rating?

Multiple murders, an attempted execution, an attempted push over a precipice, and investigation of violent crime are central to the plot.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience3/5
Why this rating?

Haller and Bosch confront threats and institutional corruption while pursuing the truth despite serious personal danger.

Creativity & curiosity2/5
Why this rating?

The narrative features inventive legal strategies, deduction, evidence analysis, and problem-solving around a compromised trial.

Diverse representation1/5
Why this rating?

Characters represent various backgrounds, though the core cast is dominated by established archetypes.

Educational value2/5
Why this rating?

It offers incidental insight into criminal defense, investigations, evidence, jury manipulation, and legal procedure, rather than formal instruction.

Kindness & empathy1/5
Why this rating?

Haller sympathizes with an addicted young man and helps him, but compassion is secondary to the crime and legal plot.

Positive messages3/5
Why this rating?

The story explores justice, corruption, accountability, evidence, professional ethics, and the consequences of criminal choices.

Good role models2/5
Why this rating?

Characters show persistence and investigative skill, but adults also commit murder, corruption, addiction, and deception.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. What did courage look like in this story? Was being brave always the same as being fearless?
  2. How did the story approach death or loss? What helped the characters cope?
  3. Which choice in The brass verdict would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in The brass verdict, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to get it

As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, Dickens & Rumi may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating