Dickens & Rumi
Cover of Jurassic World

film

Jurassic World

2015

Twenty-two years after the events of Jurassic Park, Isla Nublar now features a fully functioning dinosaur theme park, Jurassic World, as originally envisioned by John Hammond.

Ages 13+Source checked

Why this age? Frequent intense dinosaur attacks, deaths, peril involving children, frightening suspense, and some disturbing animal violence make this best suited to teens, despite limited sexual content and generally positive themes. This is guidance, not a safety guarantee; reading level and family context may differ.

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended age13+

Strongest cautions

  • Frightening scenes5/5
  • Death of a character4/5
  • Violence4/5

Strongest positives

  • Courage & resilience4/5
  • Creativity & curiosity3/5
  • Good role models3/5

What’s in it?

Products & advertising3/5
Why this rating?

The movie itself functions as a brand expansion, and the plot revolves around a corporate theme park filled with commercialized branding.

Death of a character4/5
Why this rating?

Several secondary characters are killed in various dinosaur attacks, and the stakes involve the survival of many people on the island.

Graphic injury2/5
Why this rating?

Violence is generally creature-driven and avoids extreme graphic detail, though there are depictions of characters being grabbed, bitten, or consumed.

Strong language2/5
Why this rating?

Occasional mild profanity and expletives occur, but strong or frequent language is not a major feature.

Romance2/5
Why this rating?

Features a subplot involving a rekindled romantic tension between the two adult leads.

Frightening scenes5/5
Why this rating?

The film features intense suspense, jump scares, and constant threat from dangerous predators, which may be frightening for younger viewers.

Sexual content & nudity1/5
Why this rating?

Contains very mild romantic tension and some flirtatious dialogue.

Violence4/5
Why this rating?

Frequent intense sequences of dinosaur attacks, rampages, and combat. Characters are hunted and killed by creatures in scenarios involving significant peril.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience4/5
Why this rating?

The main characters exhibit significant courage while attempting to survive and protect others from the rampant dinosaurs.

Creativity & curiosity3/5
Why this rating?

Inspires curiosity about prehistoric life and science, even if the genetic engineering portrayed is speculative.

Diverse representation2/5
Why this rating?

The cast features a multi-ethnic ensemble, though central roles follow standard archetypes.

Educational value1/5
Why this rating?

Touches on themes of genetics and animal behavior, though largely in a fictionalized sci-fi context.

Kindness & empathy2/5
Why this rating?

The bond between the animal trainer and his raptors demonstrates a form of cross-species care, alongside rescue efforts.

Positive messages3/5
Why this rating?

Themes focus on the dangers of corporate greed, unethical genetic modification, and the importance of respecting nature.

Good role models3/5
Why this rating?

Protagonists display bravery and problem-solving, though some adults exhibit poor judgment regarding safety and ethics.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. What did courage look like in this story? Was being brave always the same as being fearless?
  2. Which moment felt most tense or frightening? What helped the characters handle fear?
  3. Which choice in Jurassic World would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in Jurassic World, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to watch or buy

As an Amazon Associate, Dickens & Rumi may earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating