Dickens & Rumi
Cover of Cocoon

film

Cocoon

1985

When a group of trespassing seniors swim in a pool containing alien cocoons, they find themselves energized with youthful vigor.

Ages 12+Source checked

Why this age? The film contains some mature themes regarding aging, death, and mortality, as well as moderate language and some scenes of intense drama. It is suitable for pre-teens and older who can process these emotional concepts. This is guidance, not a safety guarantee; reading level and family context may differ.

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended age12+

Strongest cautions

  • Death of a character3/5
  • Frightening scenes2/5
  • Romance2/5

Strongest positives

  • Kindness & empathy4/5
  • Positive messages4/5
  • Courage & resilience3/5

What’s in it?

Products & advertising1/5
Why this rating?

Standard product placement for the 1980s era, but no aggressive marketing.

Death of a character3/5
Why this rating?

An alien inside a damaged cocoon dies, Rose appears to die, and the elderly residents face permanent departure and memorialization.

Strong language1/5
Why this rating?

Dialogue includes occasional mild profanity or adult expressions, without frequent or strong language.

Religious themes1/5
Why this rating?

Mentions of a memorial service, but religion is not a central focus of the plot.

Romance2/5
Why this rating?

Adult romance and affection are present, including Jack and Kitty's relationship and a final embrace; romance supports the story without dominating it.

Frightening scenes2/5
Why this rating?

Light tension regarding the discovery of the aliens and the climactic departure sequence.

Sexual content & nudity2/5
Why this rating?

The film includes mild sexual references and implied intimacy as elderly characters regain youthful energy; nothing is explicit.

Alcohol or drugs1/5
Why this rating?

Adults occasionally drink or smoke in period-appropriate social settings; substance use is incidental and not glamorized.

Violence2/5
Why this rating?

Includes minor physical altercations and a boat chase sequence involving the Coast Guard.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience3/5
Why this rating?

Characters face aging, grief, danger at sea, family separation, and an uncertain future with loyalty and personal courage.

Creativity & curiosity3/5
Why this rating?

The imaginative premise combines alien cocoons, rejuvenation, an underwater mystery, and a hopeful journey beyond Earth.

Diverse representation1/5
Why this rating?

The cast primarily consists of white elderly characters, reflecting the film's specific setting and era.

Educational value1/5
Why this rating?

Offers incidental insight into human aging and the emotional dynamics of retirement communities.

Kindness & empathy4/5
Why this rating?

Characters help protect the cocoons, rescue one another, care for spouses and grandchildren, and make sacrifices for others.

Positive messages4/5
Why this rating?

Promotes friendship, love, generosity, responsibility, accepting mortality, and making meaningful choices rather than pursuing youth at any cost.

Good role models3/5
Why this rating?

The seniors display independence and curiosity, though some behavior (trespassing) is questionable.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. Where did a character show kindness or empathy, and what changed because of it?
  2. How did the story approach death or loss? What helped the characters cope?
  3. Which choice in Cocoon would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in Cocoon, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to watch or buy

Buy or rent on AmazonFind on JustWatch

As an Amazon Associate, Dickens & Rumi may earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating