Dickens & Rumi
Cover of Holes

film

Holes

2003

After being wrongfully convicted for stealing a pair of shoes, Stanley Yelnats is sent away to Camp Green Lake, a boys detention facility where inmates are forced to dig holes all day in the hot desert sun as a form of character building. As he endures the brutal routine, Stanley begins to uncover a hidden truth behind the camp, one that connects to a dangerous secret—and possibly Stanley’s family itself.

Ages 10+Source checked

Why this age? The film is accessible to many children but includes juvenile detention, forced labor, dangerous desert survival, murder, lethal lizard threats, bullying, and emotionally serious injustice. This is guidance, not a safety guarantee; reading level and family context may differ.

Quick view

At a glance

Recommended age10+

Strongest cautions

  • Death of a character3/5
  • Frightening scenes3/5
  • Violence3/5

Strongest positives

  • Courage & resilience4/5
  • Good role models4/5
  • Kindness & empathy4/5

What’s in it?

Death of a character3/5
Why this rating?

Sam is shot and killed; Kate dies after allowing a lizard to bite her, and the film deals with grief and injustice.

Graphic injury2/5
Why this rating?

A character is shot, and another character dies from a lizard bite; imagery is not overly graphic but conveys mortality.

Strong language2/5
Why this rating?

Occasional mild name-calling and typical pre-teen banter.

Religious themes1/5
Why this rating?

A fortune teller, a family curse, and the symbolic mountain called God's Thumb appear, without substantial religious practice.

Romance2/5
Why this rating?

A historical romance between Kate and Sam includes affection and kissing, but romance is secondary to the adventure.

Frightening scenes3/5
Why this rating?

Venomous lizards, desert survival, harsh adults, possible death, and boys trapped in danger create sustained tension.

Sexual content & nudity1/5
Why this rating?

No sexual content present.

Violence3/5
Why this rating?

Includes shootings, murders, physical confrontation, an injury, threats, and dangerous exploitation of detained boys.

What’s good in it?

Courage & resilience4/5
Why this rating?

The boys endure harsh conditions, rescue one another, confront danger, and expose wrongdoing rather than abandoning each other.

Creativity & curiosity3/5
Why this rating?

The interconnected mystery, family history, folklore, inventive survival, and problem-solving strongly invite imagination and curiosity.

Diverse representation3/5
Why this rating?

The story includes Black and white characters, varied social backgrounds, and a meaningful interracial historical relationship, though representation is limited.

Educational value2/5
Why this rating?

The adventure provides incidental context about racism, injustice, poverty, family history, and consequences, but it is not primarily an instructional film.

Kindness & empathy4/5
Why this rating?

Stanley helps Zero despite personal risk, and friendship, sharing, and care ultimately overcome exploitation.

Positive messages4/5
Why this rating?

Strong themes support friendship, justice, responsibility, perseverance, compassion, and challenging abusive authority.

Good role models4/5
Why this rating?

Stanley and Zero show loyalty, courage, accountability, and care, while abusive and corrupt adults face consequences.

Family discussion

Talk about it

Conversation starters based on this title’s published content notes.

  1. What did courage look like in this story? Was being brave always the same as being fearless?
  2. How did the story approach death or loss? What helped the characters cope?
  3. Which choice in Holes would you have made differently, and why?
  4. Who changed the most in Holes, and what caused that change?
Discuss this title with other parents

Community reactions

What families noticed

Add your perspective

Sign in from the homepage to rate this title.

Where to watch or buy

As an Amazon Associate, Dickens & Rumi may earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

These content notes are a starting point, not a guarantee. Review the evidence and use your own judgment before choosing a title.

Report an incorrect rating